Today's hottest deals

Alienware Aurora R8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 175%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics187% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora R8  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0R3FWM
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '21 at 04:37
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$385
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 88.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 282
93% 170 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 873
88% 712 Pts
64-Core 1,504
93% 1,504 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$730
Dell(1028 3891) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
187% Outstanding
Lighting 271
Reflection 248
Parallax 276
221% 265 fps
MRender 308
Gravity 231
Splatting 171
186% 237 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 187%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pm981 NVMe Samsung 2048GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXB72D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 588 318 274 232 311 315 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,745
Write 870
Mixed 1,181
SusWrite 340
229% 1,034 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 53.5
162% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 885
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 436
364% 544 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 168%
Great: 330%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
182GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 417 437 427 426 431 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 419
Write 369
Mixed 354
SusWrite 423
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 46.5
152% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 352
260% 344 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 105%
Great: 130%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
767GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 162 167 165 165 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 177
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 165
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
329% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 109%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
565GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0 0.1 0 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 36
Write 35
Mixed 26
SusWrite 1.5
31% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 60%
TOSHIBA HDWE150 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.3 5.1 5 4.9 4.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 39
Write 38
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 5
37% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
136% 3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 80%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
662GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 36.3
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 0.9
34% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 71%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
6.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 35.5
Write 37.2
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 41.9
50% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 2
213% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 103%
WDC WD20 03FZEX-00SRLA0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 38 37 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 38
Write 37.7
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 37.2
50% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
143% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KTP9W1-MIE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 25.6
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 22.2
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 28: 2R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 29% 42 88 9 120 34.1" 2752 1152 DELA149 Dell AW3420DW
Typical Aurora R8 Builds (Compare 1,924 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

System: Alienware Aurora R8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback