Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	95.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '21 at 23:04
Run Duration	284 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 70.8 1-Core 123 2-Core 241 79% 145 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 769 76% 620 Pts	64-Core 1,297 80% 1,297 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% MSI(1462 C303) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95.1% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 130 Parallax 119 98% 123 fps	MRender 93.2 Gravity 123 Splatting 111 90% 109 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 1TB SSD 12,276 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 769GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS303226 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1468 953 995 1011 1017 1017 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	181% Outstanding	Read 1,296 Write 2,252 Mixed 1,368 SusWrite 1,077 340% 1,498 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 45.5 148% 57.8 MB/s	DQ Read 571 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 358 272% 376 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 181% Great: 286%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 32GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,333 Write 1,079 Mixed 702 230% 1,038 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 47.2 150% 53.3 MB/s	DQ Read 902 DQ Write 684 DQ Mixed 690 544% 759 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
OCZ RevoDrive 3 PCIe 240GB-$600 224 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 127GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 182 157 172 167 182 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 296 Write 190 Mixed 204 SusWrite 170 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 61.9 4K Mixed 28.6 100% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 154 137% 207 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 81%
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 2TB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 149 149 146 134 149 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	133% Outstanding	Read 317 Write 254 Mixed 154 SusWrite 145 160% 217 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 7.9 4K Mixed 1.2 334% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 133% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 153%
Amd-raid Array 2 3TB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 158% 724GB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 160 152 157 157 153 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 96.9 Mixed 76.7 SusWrite 155 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1 241% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 296%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB 16,483 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 835GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 106 105 106 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 102 Write 105 Mixed 61.9 SusWrite 106 126% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 44%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 11 12 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	6.1% Terrible	Read 17.1 Write 8.7 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 11.4 13% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.1% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FADM 4x4GB 420 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.1% Very good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 24.7 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 21.8 SC Write 26.6 SC Mixed 23.4 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 99.5 40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	5	60	33.1"	1280 720	AOC3279 Q3279WG5B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,409x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	541x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $189Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	533x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	321x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	229x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	207x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	172x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	246x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	185x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $669

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16