Lenovo 80E5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80E5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G50-80
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160930
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 10:49
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 82.4
1-Core 55.7
2-Core 104
52% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 189
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 M330
Legend(17AA 390C) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.21001.7005
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
4.21% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 7.4
4% 5.93 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 5.2
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.21%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$55
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 65 58 64 79 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 93.6
Write 98.4
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 61.3
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
84% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 70%
HGST HTS 541010A9E680 1TB
877GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 38.1
Mixed 34.6
SusWrite 39.7
52% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
RAMAXEL RMT3170MN68F9F1600 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO37ED
Typical 80E5 Builds (Compare 1,462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback