Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150304
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateNov 01 '15 at 02:38
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 133
2-Core 264
90% 199 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 871
85% 698 Pts
64-Core 1,087
67% 1,087 Pts
Poor: 68% Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W5100 (FireGL V)
AMD(1002 030C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.352.1014.0
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 23.1
Parallax 18
12% 18.7 fps
MRender 20.1
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 18.6
15% 18 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0135 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 2,087
Write 995
Mixed 1,341
325% 1,474 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 44.9
191% 79.4 MB/s
DQ Read 502
DQ Write 424
DQ Mixed 209
226% 378 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 223%
Great: 230%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
217GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Lio-org FILEIO 4.5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 4.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.8% Poor
Read 60.2
Write 24.6
Mixed 70.9
40% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.08
4K Write 0.17
4K Mixed 6.7
959% 3.98 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 37%
Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $953
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback