Asus A68HM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181017
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 27 '21 at 22:20
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 128
52% 87.7 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 196
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 39.9
29% 37.9 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 25.8
26% 33 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370 256GB-$110
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 240 264 267 282 280 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 396
Write 302
Mixed 278
SusWrite 252
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 9.9
58% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 126
96% 130 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
451GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 79 80 79 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
46% Average
Read 80.8
Write 80.3
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 79
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
303GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 72 72 71 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 68.6
Write 66.8
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 71.7
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.6% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 10.8
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 120 31.5" 1280 720 AUS32DA ASUS VA326
Typical A68HM-PLUS Builds (Compare 494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback