MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C51
Motherboard	MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) (all builds)
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '21 at 13:11
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	33%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 70.6 1-Core 83.8 2-Core 183 63% 112 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 346 46% 346 Pts	64-Core 343 21% 343 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1314 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.9.2 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.7% Average	Lighting 58.7 Reflection 57.5 Parallax 74.5 48% 63.6 fps	MRender 58 Gravity 58.1 Splatting 40.6 42% 52.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3Z40107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 126 18 58 11 137 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 458 Write 394 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 110 55% 247 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 15.7 4K Mixed 1 40% 12.2 MB/s	DQ Read 100 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 41.3 79% 151 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 100%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 246GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 116 117 117 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 115 Write 122 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 116 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown EKBLACK4082414AD 2x4GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	79.8% Very good	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 28.5 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 27.8 SC Mixed 22.9 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	18.5"	1280 720	GSM4C09 E1942

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,860 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	533x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	479x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	388x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	312x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	228x
GTX 1660Nvidia $209Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	222x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	219x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	204x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	102x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 43%, 3,974 samples	126x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	97x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	85x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $305

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16