Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

Performance Results


Gaming 131% UFO	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 161% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	92.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Professional Gaming (all builds)
Memory	36.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181224
Uptime	25.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '21 at 15:38
Run Duration	252 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075 10,169 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Memory 78.2 1-Core 125 2-Core 256 84% 153 Pts	4-Core 502 8-Core 927 86% 715 Pts	64-Core 2,541 157% 2,541 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 8667) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	157% Outstanding	Lighting 210 Reflection 204 Parallax 245 171% 220 fps	MRender 257 Gravity 213 Splatting 172 170% 214 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 157% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 177 171 172 163 163 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Read 480 Write 461 Mixed 374 SusWrite 192 84% 377 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 67.2 4K Mixed 44.1 145% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 354 268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 124%
MK0120EAVDT 120GB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 74GB free Firmware: HPG7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 140 149 149 149 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 223 Write 119 Mixed 141 SusWrite 148 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 14.3 4K Mixed 17.9 57% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 21.8 DQ Mixed 29 30% 52.7 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 39%
Asmt106x_ V0Fast 500GB 207GB free Firmware: 170522 SusWrite @10s intervals: 703 522 581 580 580 580 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 120GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 138 138 138 137 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 155 Write 131 Mixed 95.3 SusWrite 137 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 109%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$86 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 873GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 130 131 132 130 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Read 158 Write 159 Mixed 91.9 SusWrite 130 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 100%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 212GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 120 122 122 123 123 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 99.7 Write 93.4 Mixed 68.2 SusWrite 122 70% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 86%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$86 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 136 136 140 138 139 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 136 Write 134 Mixed 72.3 SusWrite 138 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 100%
Multiple Card Reader3 128GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 107GB free, PID 6479 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 19 19 19 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.8% Very poor	Read 19.4 Write 18.4 Mixed 18.2 SusWrite 18.7 25% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 3.5 231% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 6x8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 6 of 8 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	58% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 18.5 56% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 21.3 SC Write 24.4 SC Mixed 21.1 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 83.9 48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 121%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	58x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	43x
Ryzen TR 2990WXAMD $790Bench 79%, 3,658 samples	38x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	35x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	21x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	13x

SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	12x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	7x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3866 C18 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 102%, 1,063 samples	9x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 112%, 4,962 samples	7x
F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR 64GBUnknownBench 102%, 20 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,030

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16