Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SF314-42

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-42  (all builds)
MotherboardRO Kona_RN
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210513
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateOct 13 '21 at 23:49
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 65.1
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
84% 159 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 764
82% 652 Pts
64-Core 717
44% 717 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Acer(1025 142B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.10.20
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 20.2
12% 17 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 17.1
13% 15.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 149 134 139 142 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 1,010
Write 259
Mixed 210
SusWrite 149
88% 407 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 39.7
154% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 462
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 213
181% 273 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 110%
Great: 206%
DISK 64GB
59GB free, PID null, abc
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 17 21 17 21 21 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 34.8
Write 25.8
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 19.7
32% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 3.5
329% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB LPDDR4 4266 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.7% Very good
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 28.5
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 21.3
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-42 Builds (Compare 430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Acer Swift SF314-42

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback