Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '22 at 22:43
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 870K
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 57.9
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 119
46% 79.1 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 196
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.6% Below average
Lighting 37.6
Reflection 38.8
Parallax 54.4
31% 43.6 fps
MRender 52.8
Gravity 46.3
Splatting 37.2
36% 45.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKKB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 202 202 203 196 192 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.9% Above average
Read 203
Write 102
Mixed 118
SusWrite 196
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 33.2
110% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 30.5
DQ Write 75.6
DQ Mixed 38.5
34% 48.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 102%
WDC WD20EZBX-00AYRA0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 202 203 205 196 193 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 229
Write 215
Mixed 110
SusWrite 197
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 13.3
4K Mixed 1
32% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 9.4
DQ Mixed 0.8
2% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 46%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$30
536GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 203 203 204 203 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 161
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 202
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%
DISK 64GB
26GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.1 4.5 3.9 4.3 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.12% Terrible
Read 6.5
Write 2.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 4.2
5% 3.92 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.9% Below average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 16.5
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 11
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-S1 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback