PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible. |
Graphics | 45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B78 |
Motherboard | MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78) (all builds) |
Memory | 22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210422 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 15 '21 at 02:26 |
Run Duration | 295 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
11.7%
Very poor
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 496.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 213 173 203 166 225 MB/s
|
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
116GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 74 85 68 70 MB/s
|
34.1%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba THNSNH128GBST 128GB
76GB free
Firmware: HTRAN101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 154 131 153 141 162 MB/s
|
97.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$89
41GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 50 56 60 67 MB/s
|
34%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 107 88 109 105 110 MB/s
|
65.2%
Good
|
|||
Amd-raid WDC WDS100T2B0C- 1TB
700GB free
Firmware: 211210WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 229 160 199 198 232 MB/s
|
180%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3600C18-8GTZR F4-3600C18-8GTZR 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
|
39.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 493x |
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 105x |
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $189Bench 74%, 142,983 samples | 95x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 80x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 70x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 63x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $541 |