Biostar J3060NH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar J3060NH  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 10:48
Run Duration3078 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3060
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Memory 50.7
1-Core 24.5
2-Core 48
28% 41.1 Pts
4-Core 47.7
8-Core 49.7
6% 48.7 Pts
64-Core 46.7
3% 46.7 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 240GB 240GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 387 380 388 381 388 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 429
Write 388
Mixed 344
SusWrite 384
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 11.5
73% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 63.1
DQ Write 84.9
DQ Mixed 16.5
28% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 93%
Adata HV320 500GB
302GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 98 99 99 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 90.6
Write 96
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 97.9
62% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LFS1KBG/2G 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 5.6
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical J3060NH Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar J3060NH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $25
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback