Today's hottest deals

Megaport MS-7C75

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 166%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 175%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMegaport MS-7C75  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C75)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201013
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 13:41
Run Duration357 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$470
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 164
2-Core 319
104% 192 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 1,239
111% 940 Pts
64-Core 1,859
115% 1,859 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Palit(1569 F280) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Lighting 236
Reflection 215
Parallax 207
192% 219 fps
MRender 205
Gravity 157
Splatting 139
133% 167 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 158%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Force MP510 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM13.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2184 2253 1834 986 1001 1000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 1,445
Write 2,241
Mixed 1,607
SusWrite 1,543
388% 1,709 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 67.4
233% 85.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,245
DQ Write 806
DQ Mixed 1,030
767% 1,027 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 270%
Great: 351%
Asmt ASM1352-PM 1TB
952GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 118 118 118 120 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.2% Above average
Read 360
Write 388
Mixed 274
SusWrite 119
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 24.4
80% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 97.8
87% 131 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 71%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$54
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 187 187 192 192 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 190
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 189
107% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
Asmt ASM1352-PM 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 117 117 117 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 115
Write 111
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 116
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 100%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
5GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 37.9
Write 40.7
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 23.8
44% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 20%
WDC WD10 EURS-630AB1 1TB
448GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.1% Very poor
Read 38.9
Write 27.3
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 21
35% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 21.7
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 26.2
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7C75 Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO

System: Megaport MS-7C75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $978
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback