Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 160%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory45.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200915
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 03 '22 at 18:51
Run Duration466 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$227
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 77.3
1-Core 176
2-Core 352
105% 202 Pts
4-Core 686
8-Core 1,273
117% 979 Pts
64-Core 2,359
146% 2,359 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
136% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 174
Parallax 371
139% 238 fps
MRender 283
Gravity 125
Splatting 177
156% 195 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 136%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 1TB
618GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1410 1186 1445 1163 1339 1415 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 1,974
Write 542
Mixed 1,656
SusWrite 1,326
307% 1,375 MB/s
4K Read 67.2
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 79.7
264% 86.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,240
DQ Write 904
DQ Mixed 740
643% 961 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 290%
Great: 375%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 196 195 197 194 193 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 179
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 193
106% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
191% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 100%
Great: 130%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
547GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 95 99 101 101 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 79.6
Write 78
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 98.8
62% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
202% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 89%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
175GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 125 126 125 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 134
Write 108
Mixed 90.4
SusWrite 125
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 266 268 269 269 269 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 120%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 34.1
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 38.8
48% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 42%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
197GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 39.8
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 40.6
51% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 20%
WD My Passport 07A8 1TB
543GB free, PID 07a8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 96 96 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 91.1
Write 91.7
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 95.2
113% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 36
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 27.9
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 26.9
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $262

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback