Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming K3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 07:09
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 86.7
1-Core 139
2-Core 275
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 812
76% 633 Pts
64-Core 1,094
68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Gigabyte(1458 3FBF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.2% Very good
Lighting 95.1
Reflection 94
Parallax 87.6
78% 92.2 fps
MRender 98.5
Gravity 88.1
Splatting 76.9
71% 87.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,768
Write 1,212
Mixed 525
256% 1,168 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 52.3
212% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,099
DQ Write 941
DQ Mixed 691
608% 910 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
13GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,807
Write 1,384
Mixed 642
281% 1,278 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 51.5
226% 86.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,064
DQ Write 1,106
DQ Mixed 794
677% 988 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
352GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 91 92 94 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 142
Write 131
Mixed 77
SusWrite 91.6
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 100%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
11GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 63 68 80 75 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 76.1
Write 66.4
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 71
55% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 85%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51
414GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 73 79 69 54 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 71.4
Write 70.5
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 66.8
50% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 65%
Lacie P9233 8TB
88GB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 96 94 100 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 61.8
Write 63.3
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 95.6
44% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.5
243% 3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 92%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
111GB free, PID 0743
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 73 85 86 86 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 88.7
Write 57.8
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 73.7
84% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
58% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 45%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
292GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 88 88 88 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 116
Write 114
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 87.7
134% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 59%
WD My Book 25ED 8TB
4.5TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 175 172 168 171 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 163
Write 176
Mixed 144
SusWrite 172
225% 164 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 1.7
355% 4.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 5.1
DQ Mixed 1.9
242% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D26BFSB.16FD2 Kingston KHX2666C16/8G 859B BLS8G4D26BFSB.16FD2 Kingston KHX2666C16/8G 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 26.8
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 25.3
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $535
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback