Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory59 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 23 '21 at 12:37
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 87.3
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 182
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 605
62% 502 Pts
64-Core 1,173
73% 1,173 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 310
HP(103C 094E) 512MB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 392.50
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ72H6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,247
Write 1,108
Mixed 556
215% 970 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 54.4
190% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 885
DQ Write 596
DQ Mixed 494
436% 659 MB/s
Poor: 134% Great: 292%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
954GB free
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,512
Write 1164
Mixed 136
205% 938 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 74.1
239% 81.7 MB/s
DQ Read 927
DQ Write 637
DQ Mixed 585
490% 716 MB/s
Poor: 175% Great: 372%
Seagate Expansion Desk 12TB
25GB free
Firmware: 0915
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.6
Write 40.9
Mixed 33.9
29% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 1.1
708% 6.5 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 108%
Seagate ST4000NM0053 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: G00A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 174
Write 181
Mixed 84.9
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
215% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 103%
Seagate ST4000NM0053 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: G00A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 174
Write 178
Mixed 87.4
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
236% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 103%
Seagate ST4000NM0053 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: G00A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 172
Write 173
Mixed 86
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
221% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 103%
Seagate ST4000NM0053 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: G00A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 185
Write 170
Mixed 70.6
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.2
266% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965589-013.A00G 9965589-013.A00G Hynix HMA41GR7AFR4N-UH Hynix HMA41GR7AFR4N-UH Hynix HMA41GR7AFR4N-UH Hynix HMA41GR7AFR4N-UH 9965589-013.A00G 9965589-013.A00G 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
121% Outstanding
MC Read 52.8
MC Write 44.9
MC Mixed 45.3
136% 47.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 22.4
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 120%
This bench: 121%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $681
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback