Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '22 at 09:32
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 88
1-Core 77
2-Core 220
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 798
73% 612 Pts
64-Core 1,140
71% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 310
HP(103C 094E) 512MB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 392.50
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ72H6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 828 847 825 810 773 752 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 1,360
Write 898
Mixed 595
SusWrite 806
204% 915 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 58.6
190% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 850
DQ Write 601
DQ Mixed 454
412% 635 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 195%
Great: 292%
Seagate Expansion Desk 12TB
25GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 41 41 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 39.7
Write 39.9
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 41.6
9% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 1.3
23% 7.2 MB/s
DQ Read 4.1
DQ Write 8.8
DQ Mixed 1.6
3% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 38%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
954GB free
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1119 177 211 776 479 574 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,516
Write 1,357
Mixed 135
SusWrite 556
197% 891 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 77.9
257% 89.3 MB/s
DQ Read 908
DQ Write 639
DQ Mixed 560
476% 702 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 209%
Great: 372%
Seagate ST4000NM0053 4TB
77GB free
Firmware: G00A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 89 90 88 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 186
Write 167
Mixed 89.1
SusWrite 88.9
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
248% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 103%
Seagate ST4000NM0053 4TB
77GB free
Firmware: G00A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 88 89 87 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 129
Write 123
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 88.4
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 103%
Seagate ST4000NM0053 4TB
77GB free
Firmware: G00A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 89 88 87 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 179
Write 172
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 87.9
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 103%
Seagate ST4000NM0053 4TB
77GB free
Firmware: G00A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 89 91 91 90 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 176
Write 166
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 90.3
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
229% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965589-013.A00G 9965589-013.A00G Hynix HMA41GR7AFR4N-UH Hynix HMA41GR7AFR4N-UH Hynix HMA41GR7AFR4N-UH Hynix HMA41GR7AFR4N-UH 9965589-013.A00G 9965589-013.A00G 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
120% Outstanding
MC Read 51.6
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 45.6
134% 46.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 23.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 120%
This bench: 120%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback