Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24.4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24.4GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	17.8 GB free of 24.4141 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '21 at 03:37
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900X 5 User benchmarks, average bench 78% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 66.3 1-Core 126 2-Core 249 79% 147 Pts	4-Core 421 8-Core 1042 83% 731 Pts	64-Core 1,069 66% 1,069 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 644GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 502GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 35 36 36 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	22% Poor	Read 43.5 Write 45.7 Mixed 46.2 SusWrite 32.8 31% 42 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 94%
Qemu HARDDISK 752GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 109GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 18 19 19 18 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.1% Below average	Read 93.9 Write 129 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 17.4 54% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 24GB 506 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 0, 0 MHz 16384, 8616 MB Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 44.9 90% 31.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 13.9 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 133%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16