Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH315-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Covini_CFS
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 26 '21 at 20:49
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BHR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 127
2-Core 240
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 594
60% 489 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1343) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.37
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.5% Good
Lighting 82.7
Reflection 88.7
Parallax 85.8
67% 85.7 fps
MRender 95
Gravity 75.4
Splatting 71.2
65% 80.5 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 72%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1343) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.34% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 11.8
6% 9.33 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 10.8
8% 9.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.34%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
793GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0Q.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 505 591 514 455 446 427 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 590
Write 529
Mixed 431
SusWrite 490
115% 510 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 29.5
88% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 49.5
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 65.2
55% 77.7 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 297%
WD Elements 1TB
90GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 40 40 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 38.8
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 39.7
50% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.4% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 22.2
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 21.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-52 Builds (Compare 4,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback