Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	23.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 77.7 1-Core 102 2-Core 202 72% 127 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 641 63% 514 Pts	64-Core 859 53% 859 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6C SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 158 61 35 22 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	23.5% Poor	Read 336 Write 388 Mixed 9 SusWrite 86.1 45% 205 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.2 18% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 92%
Toshiba MG04ACA2 2TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 1.5TB free Firmware: SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 39 38 38 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 165 Write 41 Mixed 27.2 SusWrite 38.8 49% 68.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.8 173% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE 2x8GB 7,360 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.7% Very good	MC Read 31.4 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 27.3 81% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 26.6 SC Mixed 23.2 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 85 47% 85 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 107%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	54x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	45x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	44x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $408

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16