Medion P5395 2389

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion P5395 2389  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H81H3-EM2
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140825
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateNov 18 '21 at 11:30
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 82.4
2-Core 82.9
53% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 209
36% 252 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$40
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 212 211 208 201 211 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.3% Good
Read 222
Write 216
Mixed 210
SusWrite 208
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 32.7
110% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 170
133% 182 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
905GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 150 152 153 152 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 115
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 151
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 0215 CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.5% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5395 2389 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Medion P5395 2389

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $367
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback