Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac14,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac14,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27ADBB7B4CEE8E61
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '21 at 18:11
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$118
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 198
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 289
39% 291 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 775M
Apple(106B 0120) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.05
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 30.3
20% 27 fps
MRender 33.5
Gravity 30.4
Splatting 24
23% 29.3 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD WD10EZES-40UFAA0 1TB
689GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.13D03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 55 77 118 109 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 37.6
Write 62.9
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 101
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 18
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac14,2 Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac14,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback