Casper NIRVANA DT D300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCasper NIRVANA DT D300  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER H310H5 M11 001
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '21 at 20:34
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$68
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 226
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 451
60% 450 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.76
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24% Poor
Lighting 27.6
Reflection 44.2
Parallax 30.3
22% 34 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 37.3
Splatting 26.7
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 24%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 160 143 62 77 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 448
Write 376
Mixed 329
SusWrite 83.5
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 37.2
143% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 24.9
DQ Mixed 7.9
43% 106 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 90%
MD03200-BQDW-RO 320GB
62GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 61 62 60 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 59.2
Write 64.7
Mixed 46
SusWrite 60.2
42% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 24.5
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 25.3
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA DT D300 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA DT D300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback