Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	59.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20161114
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 31 '17 at 16:28
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Memory 93.6 1-Core 113 2-Core 221 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 432 8-Core 698 69% 565 Pts	64-Core 906 56% 906 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 88%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Lighting 22.7 Reflection 19.7 Parallax 23.6 18% 22 fps	MRender 28.1 Gravity 24 Splatting 20 19% 24 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 19%
Nvidia GeForce GT 520 16,336 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(172F 1040) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.66% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.35 Parallax 1.75 2% 2.07 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 1.57 2% 1.96 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.66% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Areca RAID #1 8TB 5TB free Firmware: R001 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	696% Outstanding	Read 4,380 Write 5,321 Mixed 1,293 814% 3,665 MB/s	4K Read 168 4K Write 163 4K Mixed 165 553% 165 MB/s	DQ Read 552 DQ Write 527 DQ Mixed 275 279% 451 MB/s

Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 229GB free Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6681 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 181 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 62 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 785 (EB) Unknown 99 99 49 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1469076136	114% Outstanding	Read 529 Write 502 Mixed 513 115% 515 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 98.1 4K Mixed 43.3 161% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 135 142% 231 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6649 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 191 (B1) Unknown 99 99 26 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 60 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 74 74 25999 (EB) Unknown 99 99 58 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4917549600	112% Outstanding	Read 529 Write 490 Mixed 515 114% 512 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 97.5 4K Mixed 43.1 160% 58.5 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 132 138% 225 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%
Digintel HotSwap Bay1 4TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3TB free Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 140 Write 144 Mixed 121 101% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.93 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.23 106% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 94%
Digintel HotSwap Bay2 500GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 189GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	114% Outstanding	Read 225 Write 171 Mixed 153 137% 183 MB/s	4K Read 1.02 4K Write 2.96 4K Mixed 0.32 133% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 104% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-029.A00G 9905625-029.A00G 9905625-029.A00G 9905625-029.A00G 9905598-009.A00G 9905598-009.A00G 9905598-009.A00G 9905598-009.A00G 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	119% Outstanding	MC Read 47.4 MC Write 44.2 MC Mixed 47 132% 46.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 23.7 57% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 60.7 66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $400Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	40x
Core i7-6850KIntel $190Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	30x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $350Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	22x

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $300Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $750

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353