Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	61.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150612
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '17 at 17:16
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Memory 90.4 1-Core 120 2-Core 243 85% 151 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 759 76% 621 Pts	64-Core 950 59% 950 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Lighting 21.6 Reflection 18.7 Parallax 21.8 18% 20.7 fps	MRender 26.5 Gravity 23.5 Splatting 18.4 18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Areca RAID #1 8TB 6.5TB free Firmware: R001 Max speed: UDMA 16 16MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	645% Outstanding	Read 4,264 Write 5,080 Mixed 742 744% 3,362 MB/s	4K Read 146 4K Write 147 4K Mixed 125 459% 139 MB/s	DQ Read 540 DQ Write 539 DQ Mixed 263 274% 447 MB/s

Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 238GB free Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4258 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 147 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 62 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 785 (EB) Unknown 99 99 42 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1286069759	107% Outstanding	Read 525 Write 499 Mixed 509 114% 511 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 95.6 4K Mixed 36.5 141% 53.6 MB/s	DQ Read 283 DQ Write 267 DQ Mixed 137 141% 229 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4224 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 157 (B1) Unknown 99 99 14 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 61 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 90 90 9767 (EB) Unknown 99 99 51 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3763492445	82.4% Excellent	Read 525 Write 455 Mixed 466 107% 482 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 68.6 4K Mixed 21.5 106% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 29.6 DQ Write 65.6 DQ Mixed 21.2 24% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 124%
Digintel HotSwap Bay1 4TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 165 Mixed 160 122% 162 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 2.19 4K Mixed 0.23 97% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 94%
Digintel HotSwap Bay2 500GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 302GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	111% Outstanding	Read 217 Write 169 Mixed 160 136% 182 MB/s	4K Read 1.07 4K Write 2.47 4K Mixed 0.33 126% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 104% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 114%
WD My Passport 1TB 12,840 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 172GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 92.9 Write 98.1 Mixed 78.7 115% 89.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 0.37 4K Mixed 0.18 21% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9905625-029.A00G 9905625-029.A00G 9905625-029.A00G 9905625-029.A00G 9905598-009.A00G 9905598-009.A00G 9905598-009.A00G 9905598-009.A00G 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	110% Outstanding	MC Read 42.5 MC Write 44 MC Mixed 41.9 122% 42.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 22.3 SC Mixed 23.1 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 110% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $400Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	40x
Core i7-6850KIntel $190Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	30x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $350Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	22x

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $300Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $750

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353