Asus MAXIMUS V GENE

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 23 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V GENE (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130819
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '21 at 21:54
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Memory 96.6 1-Core 120 2-Core 212 84% 143 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 463 62% 465 Pts	64-Core 479 30% 479 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 04FD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.10.2 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Lighting 65.9 Reflection 59.4 Parallax 84.6 54% 70 fps	MRender 62.5 Gravity 68.9 Splatting 44.1 46% 58.5 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 141GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 394 347 347 338 335 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 483 Mixed 394 SusWrite 368 98% 436 MB/s	4K Read 44.9 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 59.8 200% 70 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 368 277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 134%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 48GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 117 129 119 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 95.3 Write 90.9 Mixed 20.9 SusWrite 120 59% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 168GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 137 138 137 138 138 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 106 Write 77.2 Mixed 60.4 SusWrite 136 70% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 232% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 0GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 40 Write 38.8 Mixed 23.7 25% 34.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 85% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 103%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 82GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 92 93 94 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 95.2 Write 92.8 Mixed 65.4 SusWrite 92.8 64% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 86GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 104 103 103 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 112 Write 111 Mixed 66.9 SusWrite 103 72% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 109%
General USB Flash Disk 4GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 8005 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.7 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 20 Write 10 Mixed 12.9 SusWrite 9.9 16% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.8 124% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 10%
General UDisk 8GB 7,759 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	4.2% Terrible	Read 12.8 Write 1.7 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 4.7 7% 6.23 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.2% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB 40,596 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 23.9 76% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 22.6 62% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 51.8 77% 51.8 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V GENE Builds (Compare 791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V GENE - $972

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	331x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	188x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	86x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	60x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	45x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	45x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	29x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	26x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	22x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	22x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,364

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16