Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2407 0 184 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Memory 59.1 1-Core 31.4 2-Core 69.9 35% 53.5 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 216 28% 209 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 34D5) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.44% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 0.3 0% 0.47 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.44% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dell PERC H710 12TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 10.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 223 218 224 244 220 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.3% Average	Read 598 Write 268 Mixed 253 SusWrite 225 74% 336 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 11.8 4K Mixed 1.4 22% 7.43 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 14.8 DQ Mixed 4 17% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9KSF25672AZ-1G4M1 3x2GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 3 of 12 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.1% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 17.7 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.5 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,144x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,057x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	431x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16