HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory11GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3646h
Memory8.8 GB free of 11.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '21 at 04:13
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 92.9
46% 71.3 Pts
4-Core 94.6
8-Core 94.8
13% 94.7 Pts
64-Core 94
6% 94 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset
HP(103C 3646) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1855
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.41% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.6
0% 0.67 fps
MRender 0.4
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.3
0% 0.33 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.41%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4150
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 168 160 181 226 204 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
74.8% Very good
Read 259
Write 237
Mixed 149
SusWrite 193
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 39.9
141% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 197
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 111%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
254GB free
Firmware: JP2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 81 83 93 104 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 28
Write 105
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 93
46% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 76%
Hitachi Easy Device 640GB
160GB free, PID 3010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 17 18 20 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 27.7
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 18.4
34% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 21%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
44GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 47 49 54 59 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 56
Write 57.9
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 54
64% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 107C 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 17 17 20 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 32
Write 26.2
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 18.1
33% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:0D 9B ID:0D 9B ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B2873FHS-CH9 47GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 1024, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $117
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback