Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5335 90 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Proc 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Memory 47.8 1-Core 24.5 2-Core 49.2 27% 40.5 Pts	4-Core 84.9 8-Core 123 13% 104 Pts	64-Core 141 9% 141 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 42%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 128GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.66 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 24 20 13 2.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	7.36% Terrible	Read 5.3 Write 53.9 Mixed 3.5 SusWrite 15.9 14% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 4.2 876% 5.97 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.36% Great: 61%
WD Game Drive 4TB 3,751 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 697GB free, PID 262f Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9.9 8.9 9.1 15 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 22.8 Mixed 22 SusWrite 12.7 28% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x4GB 5,222 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 4 11% 3.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 2.2 7% 2.33 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 148%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.20GHz1stBench 32%, 155 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E54301stBench 45%, 279 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E54201stBench 44%, 349 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GTS 250NvidiaBench 7%, 14,881 samples	3x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	1x

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

Value: 13% - Very poor

Total price: $95

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16