Asus A88XM-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A88XM-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '21 at 00:14
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 55.6
2-Core 80.8
41% 65.1 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 144
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3205) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.7% Below average
Lighting 43.4
Reflection 45.2
Parallax 40.4
35% 43 fps
MRender 36.4
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 35.5
31% 37.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 43 20 88 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 325
Write 187
Mixed 130
SusWrite 71.5
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 16.9
47% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 46.7
DQ Mixed 19.7
30% 57.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23
465GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 115 122 122 122 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 115
Write 106
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 118
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.5% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 10.4
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 9
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback