Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateDec 24 '21 at 14:38
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 64.2
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 169
61% 108 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 640
56% 478 Pts
64-Core 2,472
153% 2,472 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M5000
Nvidia(10DE 1152) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.3% Above average
Lighting 60.1
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 63.1
49% 64.9 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 62
Splatting 64.5
53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
793GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1179 1032 984 1008 923 926 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,882
Write 844
Mixed 1,178
SusWrite 1,008
273% 1,228 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 62.8
179% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 628
DQ Write 398
DQ Mixed 522
387% 516 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 217%
Great: 410%
Avago MR9341-8i 256GB
214GB free
Firmware: 4.65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 150 143 136 138 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 305
Write 158
Mixed 161
SusWrite 138
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 19.3
87% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 107
92% 134 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 105%
Avago MR9341-8i 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 4.65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 176 179 177 177 178 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 167
Mixed 97.4
SusWrite 177
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.8
375% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 117%
Avago MR9341-8i 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 4.65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 202 202 202 203 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 207
Write 209
Mixed 104
SusWrite 202
132% 180 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.8
390% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 118%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GR7MFR8N-UH 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.5% Good
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 22.7
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback