PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Medionpc MS-7707 (all builds) |
Motherboard | MEDIONPC MS-7707 |
Memory | 4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110215 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 04 '22 at 00:21 |
Run Duration | 219 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 57% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2300
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 18,289,698 GHz (avg)
|
55.5%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3K87RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 73 59 53 32 67 MB/s
|
35.9%
Below average
|
|||
USB_DISK 4GB
4GB free, PID 0201
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.9 2 1.9 2 1.9 MB/s
|
2.41%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
44.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2300IntelBench 64%, 19,722 samples | 41x |
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 20x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 6%, 436 samples | 17x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 5x |
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 22% - Poor | Total price: $28 |