Today's hottest deals

Intel B75

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics74.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel B75  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180809
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJan 05 '22 at 20:36
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770S-$92
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 151
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 412
42% 340 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
PNY(196E 1347) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Lighting 93.4
Reflection 91.5
Parallax 85.2
76% 90 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 81
Splatting 73.1
71% 89.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 82 82 78 79 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 453
Write 176
Mixed 134
SusWrite 89
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 26.9
97% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 78.2
DQ Mixed 142
128% 203 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 133%
Liteon UITRA1 4TB
114GB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 26.9
Mixed 27
SusWrite 24.2
21% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 92%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB
11GB free, PID 00c4
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.4 4.4 4 3.6 4.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
4.78% Terrible
Read 19.9
Write 5.3
Mixed 12
SusWrite 3.6
12% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.78%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 16.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Builds (Compare 5,148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel B75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback