ADD TO PC
BUILD

Seneca PRO465596

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Seneca PRO465596 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK H81M-A
Memory	1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140106
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '22 at 01:55
Run Duration	685 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690-$51 73,695 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 109 2-Core 215 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 255 42% 298 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Gigabyte(1458 228F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	15.3% Very poor	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 72.7 Parallax 0.2 0% 24.3 fps	MRender 63.9 Gravity 59.6 Splatting 45.5 45% 56.3 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD 16,267 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 310GB free Firmware: CS900Y13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 456 459 457 446 418 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Read 199 Write 106 Mixed 173 SusWrite 448 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 77.1 4K Mixed 38.3 137% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 197 161% 225 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 96%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60 23,997 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 222GB free (System drive) Firmware: JE3AD70F SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 60 62 58 57 40 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	34.5% Below average	Read 65.1 Write 68.4 Mixed 38.3 SusWrite 54.8 42% 56.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 50%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 221GB free Firmware: AM0P4C SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 90 90 90 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 79.8 Write 95.6 Mixed 33.8 SusWrite 90 54% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 60%
Seagate Photo Drive 2TB 261 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9340 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 125 124 124 131 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 116 Write 126 Mixed 44.6 SusWrite 127 75% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 70%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,758 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 789GB free, PID 0100 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 107 106 106 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 100 Write 103 Mixed 37 SusWrite 106 115% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 0215 CMX12GX3M3A1333C9 8GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.2% Above average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 15.4 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 15.9 44% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 64.5 62% 64.5 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback