Today's hottest deals

Acer NC-SF314-52-P2JL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer NC-SF314-52-P2JL  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Suntory_KL
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180823
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 20:29
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4415U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 77
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 131
56% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 193
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
Acer(1025 118C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 3.5
0% 2.43 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 3
Splatting 6
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK10D7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 38 22 34 25 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 397
Write 81.3
Mixed 286
SusWrite 25.7
43% 198 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 26.5
36% 9.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5644EB0-CRC 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 19.9
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 18.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NC-SF314-52-P2JL Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer NC-SF314-52-P2JL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback