Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 17-by0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 17-by0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84CA
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200423
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 25 '22 at 02:48
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4417U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 59
1-Core 43.8
2-Core 75
38% 59.3 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 100
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 84.4
5% 84.4 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
HP(103C 84CA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 3.5
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
802GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 38 19 16 25 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 38.7
Write 62
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 32.4
37% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.6
163% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 1.9
15% 5.13 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 1.3
5% 1.63 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 17-by0xxx Builds (Compare 584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 17-by0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback