Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateJan 13 '22 at 06:59
Run Duration411 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$138
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 66.3
1-Core 142
2-Core 268
85% 159 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 850
83% 680 Pts
64-Core 1,353
84% 1,353 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.5% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 109
Parallax 100
83% 104 fps
MRender 95.6
Gravity 101
Splatting 98.6
81% 98.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 88%
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.11.3
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 145
Parallax 195
103% 155 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 136
Splatting 97.3
94% 118 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 100%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$185
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,160
Write 1,801
Mixed 2,012
444% 1,991 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 71.1
229% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 737
DQ Write 530
DQ Mixed 607
461% 625 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 472%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
0GB free
Firmware: P3CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 724
Write 180
Mixed 489
102% 464 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 34.2
119% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 87.5
DQ Write 55
DQ Mixed 66
51% 69.5 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 242%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
959GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 69.5
Write 119
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 0.8
90% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 0.8
431% 4.4 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 1
396% 4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 92%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
97GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 63.1
Write 30.2
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 1.2
42% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 48%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
496GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 88.7
Write 91.9
Mixed 77.9
SusWrite 0.8
83% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 56%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 141 154 153 158 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 135
Write 108
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 153
162% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 62%
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
715GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 150
Write 155
Mixed 82.8
SusWrite 0.8
121% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
75% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 67%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
600GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 15 21 22 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 122
Write 105
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 20.1
101% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 48%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 108 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 92.8
Write 120
Mixed 94.6
SusWrite 108
145% 104 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
213% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 74%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
6TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 108 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 80.2
Write 128
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 108
142% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.8
316% 3.3 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 11.9
DQ Mixed 0.8
433% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
62.6% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 24.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 20.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $894
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback