Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive342% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX HERO  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 16 '17 at 09:12
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$166
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 284
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 793
81% 655 Pts
64-Core 793
49% 793 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Lighting 159
Reflection 163
Parallax 154
130% 159 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 150
Splatting 119
106% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 117%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
342% Outstanding
Read 2,962
Write 1,850
Mixed 1,871
492% 2,228 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 75
281% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 597
DQ Write 504
DQ Mixed 261
274% 454 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 342%
Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
213GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 415
Mixed 423
100% 452 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 51.6
200% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 120
147% 261 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 122%
Great: 124%
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$69
110GB free
Firmware: E7FM02.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 2,070
Write 1,136
Mixed 1,450
343% 1,552 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 56.9
205% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 603
DQ Write 516
DQ Mixed 155
227% 425 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 240%
Great: 185%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
690GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 115
Write 125
Mixed 91.8
141% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.49
67% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 48%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB
545GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 139
Write 134
Mixed 89.1
150% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.26
50% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 71%
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Z3A0 1TB
466GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
45% Average
Read 105
Write 107
Mixed 75
121% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.26
80% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45%
Great: 53%
WDC WD10 EARX-00N0YB0 1TB
463GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 83.4
Write 55
Mixed 39.8
69% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 0.35
4K Mixed 0.14
18% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 33
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 45.4
SC Mixed 31.6
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 52
77% 52 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 104%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX HERO Builds (Compare 4,422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $757
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback