Performance Results

Gaming 55%
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 50%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 04:19
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$143
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 194
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 601
59% 482 Pts
64-Core 779
48% 779 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270
Asus(1043 8818) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 496.49
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (84 fps cap detected)
68.5% Good
Lighting 84.4
Reflection 84.5
Parallax 84.4
69% 84.4 fps
MRender 84.5
Gravity 84.4
Splatting 80.8
68% 83.2 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: OC34L5TA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,157
Write 614
Mixed 487
165% 753 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 30.1
130% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 461
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 74.5
125% 250 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 159%
Intel 730 Series 480GB-$230
163GB free
Firmware: L2010420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 450 408 445 432 438 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 406
Write 462
Mixed 333
SusWrite 435
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 36.4
133% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 313
238% 321 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 110%
WD Red Pro 4TB (2014)-$165
459GB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 102 94 98 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 105
Write 86.7
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 98.8
67% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$234
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM 3000 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.4% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 22.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 19.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 45%
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $508
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback