MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201113
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 25 '20 at 13:19
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 159
2-Core 318
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 623
8-Core 912
96% 768 Pts
64-Core 1,142
71% 1,142 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
145% Outstanding
Lighting 191
Reflection 177
Parallax 366
156% 245 fps
MRender 284
Gravity 126
Splatting 178
157% 196 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 145%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1243 373 314 313 311 313 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 2,032
Write 1,286
Mixed 673
SusWrite 478
246% 1,117 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 56.3
233% 88.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,065
DQ Write 1,157
DQ Mixed 775
676% 999 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 230%
Great: 236%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
625GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1737 1037 1038 1039 1037 1034 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 1553
Write 1,550
Mixed 1,834
SusWrite 1,154
344% 1,523 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 90.9
311% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1451
DQ Write 1,340
DQ Mixed 1,436
1,066% 1,409 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 291%
Great: 310%
WD Red Pro 4TB (2014)-$165
3.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 173 173 173 173 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 162
Mixed 111
SusWrite 173
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
24GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 13 13 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 39.8
Write 19.2
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 13
23% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
33% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 48.4
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 41.5
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 33
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 42.7
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 16,150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $678
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback