PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 19.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H61DE/S3 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120711 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 22 '22 at 17:08 |
Run Duration | 186 Seconds |
Run User | DNK-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570K-$70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
|
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
Asus(1043 86B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.4%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 81 116 107 129 135 MB/s
|
19.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
129GB free
Firmware: KC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 74 85 88 90 91 MB/s
|
49.9%
Average
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
10GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3 3.8 4.6 5 4.9 MB/s
|
3.94%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
36.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $173Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 8x |
Core i3-2120Intel $100Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 6x |
Core i5-2400Intel $40Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 5x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 4x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $144Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $196 |