Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 210%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics212% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '22 at 13:39
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$385
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 95
1-Core 143
2-Core 288
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 1010
95% 787 Pts
64-Core 1,566
97% 1,566 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 100%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$535
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
212% Outstanding
Lighting 311
Reflection 297
Parallax 330
253% 312 fps
MRender 360
Gravity 265
Splatting 194
214% 273 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 212%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
738GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1640 1436 1372 1361 1348 1334 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,518
Write 2,283
Mixed 1,543
SusWrite 1415
434% 1,940 MB/s
4K Read 60
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 81.8
270% 93.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,094
DQ Write 814
DQ Mixed 990
730% 966 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 314%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
475GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2291 2247 1450 1475 1453 1472 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
341% Outstanding
Read 2,557
Write 2,161
Mixed 1,480
SusWrite 1,731
444% 1,983 MB/s
4K Read 61.4
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 84.4
276% 95.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,196
DQ Write 911
DQ Mixed 1,070
796% 1,059 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 341%
Great: 410%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 10TB
6TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 42 42 41 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 102%
Tdas TerraMaster 3TB
933GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 39
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 10.7
22% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 95%
Tdas TerraMaster 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 39
Mixed 29
SusWrite 10.8
21% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 95%
Tdas TerraMaster 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 41
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 10.9
23% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.8
301% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 120%
Tdas TerraMaster 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 34.9
Write 39.9
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 10.9
22% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.1
239% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU64GX4M4C3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 30.3
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 46.1
SC Mixed 30.8
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 57.1
70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 103%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback