HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	65.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84FD
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210802
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '22 at 04:41
Run Duration	266 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$285 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	Memory 90.5 1-Core 140 2-Core 281 94% 171 Pts	4-Core 561 8-Core 996 94% 779 Pts	64-Core 1,038 64% 1,038 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$241 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	65.2% Good	Lighting 90 Reflection 89.8 Parallax 51.7 73% 77.2 fps	MRender 104 Gravity 38.2 Splatting 47.2 49% 63 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1006 512GB 8,409 User benchmarks, average bench 167% 432GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20120006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 628 739 742 732 733 732 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	207% Outstanding	Read 1,193 Write 1,224 Mixed 1,031 SusWrite 718 234% 1,041 MB/s	4K Read 44.5 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 63.9 217% 79 MB/s	DQ Read 1,083 DQ Write 1,075 DQ Mixed 1,076 809% 1078 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 207% Great: 219%
JMicron Generic DISK02 10TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 1 0.8 0.6 0.5 4.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Read 141 Write 150 Mixed 92.1 SusWrite 5.2 123% 97.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 1.2 221% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 111%
JMicron Generic DISK03 14TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 6.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 178 180 179 178 183 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	116% Outstanding	Read 238 Write 225 Mixed 175 SusWrite 169 268% 202 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 13.2 4K Mixed 1.1 545% 10 MB/s	DQ Read 3.3 DQ Write 12.6 DQ Mixed 1.3 485% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 116%
JMicron Generic DISK04 16TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 8TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 1 0.9 0.6 0.5 1.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 245 Write 198 Mixed 180 SusWrite 4.6 194% 157 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 12.8 4K Mixed 1.2 547% 11 MB/s	DQ Read 2.9 DQ Write 14 DQ Mixed 1.6 541% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 104%
JMicron Generic DISK01 8TB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 4.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 1 0.8 0.5 0.6 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	33% Below average	Read 123 Write 159 Mixed 88.5 SusWrite 6.1 122% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 1 190% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 91%
JMicron Generic DISK00 6TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 5.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 178 178 178 178 183 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Read 209 Write 212 Mixed 88.7 SusWrite 168 223% 169 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 187% 6.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB 8,406 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	48.5% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 14.4 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 13.8 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
5%	4%	23	191	86	60	84.6"	2560 1440	SAM7103 SAMSUNG

History: Score 5: 0R 1G 2B | Score 5: 1R 0G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	2,448x
Core i7-9700Intel $230Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	2,070x
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	731x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	1,365x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	849x
RTX 2060Nvidia $241Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	729x

SSD
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	1,433x
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples	1,258x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 152%, 17,295 samples	306x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,406 samples	1,949x
HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 47%, 4,169 samples	793x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	466x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 110% - Outstanding

Total price: $329

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397