Acer Aspire X3400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire X3400  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X3400
Memory0.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100601
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 14 '17 at 15:39
Run Duration339 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 435-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 42.4
2-Core 82.2
44% 66.3 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 126
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9200
Acer(1025 0228) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.16.11.9125
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.53
Reflection 1.19
Parallax 0.12
0% 0.62 fps
MRender 1.33
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 1
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721010CLA 1TB-$54
832GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4O
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 99.7
Write 90.9
Mixed 52.5
60% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.04
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.13
35% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 72%
hp v211w 8GB
7GB free, PID 7840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
6.38% Terrible
Read 19.4
Write 4.6
Mixed 6.47
10% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.38
4K Write 0.57
4K Mixed 0.55
51% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.38%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B2873FHS-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 3GB
1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.1% Poor
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X3400 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback