Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte A320MA-M.2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170613
Uptime5 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '22 at 06:52
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 68%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 76
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 176
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 564
51% 430 Pts
64-Core 780
48% 780 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.1% Average
Lighting 62.2
Reflection 58.2
Parallax 83.5
51% 68 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 66.9
Splatting 44.7
46% 57.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$69
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM02.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 162 161 163 159 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 712
Write 141
Mixed 279
SusWrite 166
71% 324 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 27.4
95% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 522
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 180
175% 288 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 185%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
834GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 189 189 190 188 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 133
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 187
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 34.8
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 23.6
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320MA-M.2-CF Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback