Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 456 User benchmarks, average bench 67% Proc 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	40.8% Average	Memory 41.6 1-Core 55.7 2-Core 111 39% 69.6 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 442 38% 328 Pts	64-Core 1,108 69% 1,108 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 200GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: 7.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	1.23% Terrible	Read 2 Write 2 Mixed 2.3 SusWrite 2.3 2% 2.15 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.23% Great: 95%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 916GB 653GB free Firmware: 7.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	0.94% Terrible	Read 1 Write 0.8 Mixed 1 SusWrite 2.3 1% 1.27 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s

HP LOGICAL VOLUME 1TB 691 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 919GB free Firmware: 7.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	0.94% Terrible	Read 1 Write 1.3 Mixed 1.3 SusWrite 2.3 1% 1.47 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 0.94% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HP 752369-081 8x16GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	88.8% Excellent	MC Read 38.1 MC Write 40.7 MC Mixed 35 108% 37.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 195 20% 195 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 122%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16