Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory53.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150930
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '22 at 14:07
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$116
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 84.8
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 216
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 748
73% 598 Pts
64-Core 932
58% 932 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Gigabyte(1458 402B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.6% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 129
Parallax 111
94% 118 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 96.7
Splatting 93.4
88% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$227
463GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 463
Write 435
Mixed 415
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 45.8
152% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 346
262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$250
87GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 426
Write 134
Mixed 341
66% 300 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 40.2
140% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 160
169% 279 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 122%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
17GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1
Write 0.5
Mixed 1
1% 0.83 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTZN 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.4% Very good
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 23.8
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 21.8
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback