Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '22 at 07:27
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Memory 47.1
1-Core 50.3
2-Core 143
43% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 113
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 13 11 8.2 32 295 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 264
Write 558
Mixed 362
SusWrite 64.6
71% 312 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 16.9
4K Mixed 10.9
36% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 236
180% 246 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 86%
Vmware Virtual disk 537GB
496GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 15 12 9.5 37 350 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 587
Write 590
Mixed 542
SusWrite 76.1
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 21.2
4K Mixed 14.5
45% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 262
190% 249 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 24.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.2
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,831 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback