Gigabyte GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive29.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160128
Uptime29.3 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '22 at 17:43
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$127
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 127
57% 91.6 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 356
37% 297 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 5800
Nvidia(10DE 0593) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
6.98% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 4.5
8% 8.33 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 0.3
4% 6.33 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.98%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 27 36 28 35 20 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.5% Poor
Read 214
Write 159
Mixed 8
SusWrite 34
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 0.1
51% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 0.1
32% 79.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
188GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 109 110 109 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 138
Write 130
Mixed 30
SusWrite 108
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
216GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 92 92 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 110
Write 99.7
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 92.5
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58%
Great: 88%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 111 113 114 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 68.7
Write 105
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 110
70% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.2
121% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS BLS8G3D169DS3 BLS8G3D1609DS BLS8G3D169DS3 32GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.1% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 17.4
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 13.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $211
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-12400F $117Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $393
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback