Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150528
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateOct 29 '17 at 10:50
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$127
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 73.6
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 137
57% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 401
40% 324 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 1375) 2GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.5% Below average
Lighting 44.8
Reflection 43.6
Parallax 38.9
36% 42.5 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 34.9
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate NAS HDD 3TB-$119
1TB free
Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 135
Write 120
Mixed 121
94% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.14
71% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 99%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
915GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 88.1
Write 124
Mixed 117
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.28
104% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
602GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 225
Write 153
Mixed 150
132% 176 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.2
102% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 108%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
248GB free
Firmware: CC3E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 93.8
Write 90
Mixed 71.3
64% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.34
80% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 69%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$90
215GB free
Firmware: JP4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 79
Write 89.9
Mixed 86.4
64% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.35
89% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS BLS8G3D169DS3 BLS8G3D1609DS BLS8G3D169DS3 32GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.1% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 8.6
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-12400F $117Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $68
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $393
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback