HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 22 months ago.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1495
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130415
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '22 at 20:56
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$84
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 188
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 460
48% 386 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1495) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.2
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HMRSK0002TBAT07K 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MK7O3P01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 66 89 115 106 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
69% Good
Read 143
Write 147
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 97.7
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69%
Great: 84%
Hitachi HMS5C4040BLE640 4TB
52GB free
Firmware: MPAOA5D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 98 97 97 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 101
Write 101
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 95.2
61% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 73%
Asmt ASMT105 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 28 29 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 21.5
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 28.2
19% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 102%
Jmicron Generic 2TB
821GB free
Firmware: 9201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 21.9
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 28.4
20% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback